Powers v. Secretary of Administration
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
412 Mass. 119, 587 N.E.2d 744 (1992)
- Written by Galina Abdel Aziz , JD
Facts
The 1991 Receivership Act (RA) declared that a fiscal crisis existed in the City of Chelsea (city) and established a receivership for the city. Pursuant to the RA, the governor appointed a receiver to an initial one-year term to address the fiscal concerns. The mayor’s office was vacated, and the receiver was vested with all the mayor’s previously vested powers. The board of alderman was vested only with the power to advise the receiver, and the receiver had to report to the state secretary of administration (defendant). Powers and other citizens and homeowners in the city (city residents) (plaintiffs) sought declaratory judgment that the RA violated the Home Rule Amendment of the state constitution, alleging that the RA violated the Home Rule Amendment’s restriction on the legislature to pass special laws under explicitly defined special circumstances and the right of self-government in local matters in the state constitution. The city residents also alleged that the RA violated the one man, one vote rule under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Liacos, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.