PP v. DD
Ontario Court of Appeal
2017 ONCA 180 (Can.) (2017)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
PP (plaintiff) and DD (defendant) engaged in sexual intercourse over the course of several dates. PP offered to use condoms, but DD assured PP that DD was on birth-control pills. A few weeks after the two ended their sexual relationship, DD informed PP that she had not used birth control, that she was pregnant, and that she intended to keep the baby. PP brought an involuntary-parenthood suit against DD, alleging that his consent to intercourse had been obtained through deception and was therefore void. PP sought $4 million in damages for the emotional distress that he claimed resulted from being deprived of the ability to choose when he became a parent. DD moved to dismiss, and the motion was granted. PP appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rouleau, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.