Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
  • P
  • PPC Broadband, Inc. v. Corning Optical Commu…PPC Broadband, Inc. v. Corning Optical Communications RF, LLC
From our private database of 16,600+ case briefs...

PPC Broadband, Inc. v. Corning Optical Communications RF, LLC

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
815 F.3d 747 (2016)


Facts

PPC Broadband Inc. (defendant) owned a patent relating to coaxial cable connectors. The patent included language stating that a piece of the connector—called a continuity member—would be positioned to reside around an external portion of the connector. Corning Optical Communications, RF (Corning) (plaintiff) filed a petition requesting an inter partes review of the patent. Corning maintained that the claims were invalid as obvious based on the combination of existing patents. During the inter partes proceeding, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the board) used a general dictionary to define the term “reside around.” The board determined that “reside around” meant “in the immediate vicinity of.” The board concluded that a combination of the prior patents explained a continuity member that was positioned in the immediate vicinity of an external portion of the connector. The board also stated that because PPC used the word “surrounded” in the preamble of the claim, “reside around” must have a different meaning. The board held that, given these conclusions, the claims at issue were obvious. PPC appealed, arguing that the board’s construction was unreasonably broad in light of the claims and specification of PPC’s patent. PPC argued that the broadest reasonable construction of “reside around” in light of the claims and specification was “encircle or surround.” The appeal was heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Moore, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 436,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,600 briefs, keyed to 223 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial