PPG Industries, Inc. v. Transamerica Insurance Co.

975 P.2d 652, 84 Cal. Rptr. 2d 455, 20 Cal. 4th 310 (1999)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

PPG Industries, Inc. v. Transamerica Insurance Co.

California Supreme Court
975 P.2d 652, 84 Cal. Rptr. 2d 455, 20 Cal. 4th 310 (1999)

JC

Facts

PPG Industries, Inc. (PPG) (plaintiff) was the successor in interest to Solaglas California, Inc. (Solaglas). Solaglas made and distributed auto windshields. In 1982, George Miller was driving a truck when another vehicle hit the truck and caused the truck to jump the curb and hit a light pole. The Solaglas-manufactured windshield popped out, and Miller was ejected from the vehicle. Miller became a person with quadriplegia as a result of his injuries. Miller then sued Solaglas for both compensatory and punitive damages. Solaglas tendered the defense to its liability carrier, Transamerica Insurance Co. (Transamerica) (defendant). Transamerica agreed to defend Solaglas but told the business that the policies did not provide coverage for punitive damages. After settlement negotiations were unsuccessful (with Miller offering to settle within the limits of Solaglas’s policy), a trial resulted in a $6.1 million judgment against Solaglas, with $5.1 million in compensatory damages and $1 million in punitive damages. Transamerica paid the $1.5 million policy limits, and excess carrier Industrial Indemnity Company paid the remaining $3.6 million in compensatory damages. PPG then sued Transamerica for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in each Transamerica policy, premised on the notion that failing to settle unreasonably had exposed PPG (by this point acting in the stead of Solaglas) to the $1 million in punitive damages. At trial, Transamerica moved for summary judgment and won based on a rule prohibiting indemnity coverage for punitive damages. PPG then appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kennard, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership