Premier Van Schaack Realty, Inc. v. Sieg

51 P.3d 24 (2002)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Premier Van Schaack Realty, Inc. v. Sieg

Court of Appeals of Utah
51 P.3d 24 (2002)

  • Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD

Facts

Premier Van Schaack Realty, Inc. (Premier) (plaintiff) entered into an agreement with Thomas Sieg (defendant) regarding the sale of Sieg’s real estate. Under the agreement, Sieg would owe Premier a commission, in the amount of 7 percent of the acquisition price, if a sale or exchange of the property occurred. Sieg signed an operating agreement forming MJTM, a limited liability company. Under the operating agreement, Sieg would convey the real estate to MJTM, and would receive a 40 percent interest in MJTM, a 9 percent preferential return on its future profits, and a beginning balance of $670,000 in his initial capital contribution account. MJTM also agreed to assume $580,000 of Sieg’s debt, and the other LLC members agreed not to encumber the real estate without Sieg’s approval. The operating agreement also stated that the property was valued at $1.3 million. Sieg transferred title of the property to MJTM. Sieg personally guaranteed a $1.413 million loan that MJTM obtained with the property as security, which it used to pay off $300,000 of Sieg’s debt. Premier demanded a commission of 7 percent of $1.3 million. Sieg refused to pay, and Premier brought suit. The trial court granted summary judgment for Sieg, finding that there had been no sale or exchange pursuant to the agreement between Premier and Sieg that would trigger the commission provision, because Sieg’s transaction with MJTM lacked consideration. Premier appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Greenwood, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership