Preminger v. Columbia Pictures Corp.
New York Supreme Court
267 N.Y.S.2d 594 (1966), aff'd, 269 N.Y.S.2d 913, aff'd, 18 N.Y.2d 659 (1966)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Otto Preminger (plaintiff) produced and directed the motion picture Anatomy of a Murder. Carlyle Productions, Inc. (Carlyle) (plaintiff) owned the rights to the picture. Carlyle entered a series of agreements with Columbia Pictures Corporation (Columbia) (defendant) for distribution of the film. The agreements gave Preminger and Carlyle final cut over the film. However, the contractual language concerning the grant of television rights did not reference cutting or editing. Preminger and Carlyle objected to the cutting of the film for television and brought suit to obtain an injunction against Columbia and Screen Gems, Inc. (defendant), a Columbia subsidiary, to prevent broadcast. Preminger and Carlyle argued that edits would undermine the artistic and commercial value of the film and damage Preminger’s reputation in the film industry. Evidence presented by Columbia and Screen Gems established that minor cuts, especially to accommodate commercials, were the prevailing custom in the television industry.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Klein, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
