Prescott v. Smits

505 A.2d 1211 (1985)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Prescott v. Smits

Vermont Supreme Court
505 A.2d 1211 (1985)

Facts

In May 1982, Dirk Smits and Kay Smits (defendants) leased a farm from Richard Prescott and Nancy Prescott (plaintiffs). The parties orally agreed the lease would last for three years. Upon moving onto the farm, the Smits experienced numerous issues with the property. In October 1982, the Smits vacated the farm and stopped paying rent. The Prescotts sued for nonpayment of rent. Any lease longer than one year must be in writing. The parties did not dispute that the original oral lease was invalid for this reason and that it created a mere tenancy at will. The dispute was whether this tenancy at will had been converted into a year-to-year tenancy. If a year-to-year tenancy had been created, then the Smits were required to pay rent for the full year, even though they vacated in less than a year. The Smits argued that a year-to-year tenancy can only be found if there is continuous possession over a period of years, which was not the case here. The lower court found that a year-to-year tenancy had been created and held the Smits liable for one year’s rent, minus the amount they had already paid. The Smits appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hill, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 736,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 736,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 736,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership