Presley v. Etowah County Commission
United States Supreme Court
502 U.S. 491 (1992)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
Two county commissions in Alabama enacted provisions that changed the authority granted to their elected commissioners for determining how to allocate funds for road maintenance and repair. The Etowah County Commission (defendant) passed a common fund resolution that placed the county’s road funds in a common account and required county-wide determinations of how the funds would be spent. Prior to the resolution, funds had been allocated to individual county road districts, and the commissioner for each district had been fully responsible for determining how to spend the funds. The Russell County Commission passed a resolution that, among other things, abolished its individual road districts and transferred decision-making authority concerning road maintenance and improvement from the county commissioners to the appointed county engineer. Etowah County Commissioner Presley (plaintiff), along with other plaintiffs, filed a lawsuit challenging both resolutions because they had not been precleared subject to § 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The district court held that neither resolution was subject to preclearance, and Presley appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.