Presley v. Etowah County Commission

502 U.S. 491 (1992)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Presley v. Etowah County Commission

United States Supreme Court
502 U.S. 491 (1992)

Facts

Two county commissions in Alabama enacted provisions that changed the authority granted to their elected commissioners for determining how to allocate funds for road maintenance and repair. The Etowah County Commission (defendant) passed a common fund resolution that placed the county’s road funds in a common account and required county-wide determinations of how the funds would be spent. Prior to the resolution, funds had been allocated to individual county road districts, and the commissioner for each district had been fully responsible for determining how to spend the funds. The Russell County Commission passed a resolution that, among other things, abolished its individual road districts and transferred decision-making authority concerning road maintenance and improvement from the county commissioners to the appointed county engineer. Etowah County Commissioner Presley (plaintiff), along with other plaintiffs, filed a lawsuit challenging both resolutions because they had not been precleared subject to § 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The district court held that neither resolution was subject to preclearance, and Presley appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership