Press-Citizen Co. v. University of Iowa
Iowa Supreme Court
817 N.W.2d 480 (2012)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
The Iowa Open Records Act required public institutions, such as the University of Iowa (the university) (defendant), to make their records publicly available upon request. A student at the university reported being sexually assaulted by two football players. Following significant publicity about the reported assault and the university’s handling of the report, the Iowa City Press-Citizen (Press-Citizen) (plaintiff), a newspaper, requested all of the university’s records relating to documents and communications among university officials about recently reported sexual assaults. The university located approximately 2,000 pages of documents responsive to the request but produced only 18 pages to the Press-Citizen. The university claimed that the other documents contained personal student information that the university could not disclose under the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). The Press-Citizen sued the university to compel production of the documents under the Iowa Open Records Act. After reviewing the contested documents in camera, the district court ordered the university to produce some documents in full and to produce other documents with redactions. The university appealed the order to the Iowa Supreme Court. The university argued that, under FERPA, many of the redacted documents ordered by the district court should be withheld because the Press-Citizen and the public could use the visible information and the report’s publicity to figure out the identity of the students mentioned in those documents.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Mansfield, J.)
Dissent (Appel, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.