From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of California, Riverside County
United States Supreme Court
464 U.S. 501 (1984)
Facts
Albert Greenwood-Brown was charged in California Superior Court with raping and murdering a teenage girl. Press-Enterprise Co. (plaintiff) moved for open voir dire proceedings for the trial. The state opposed the motion. The trial court (defendant) only allowed Press-Enterprise to attend general voir dire and decided that special, individual voir dire would be conducted in private. Out of six weeks of voir dire, only three days were open to the public. After voir dire concluded, Press-Enterprise moved for a full transcript of the voir dire proceedings to be released. The court denied the motion despite admitting that most of the transcript did not implicate privacy concerns. The court considered two interests in its closure order and order denying a transcript—the right to a fair trial and the right to privacy of prospective jurors—but did not articulate the threat that open voir dire posed to those interests or consider whether alternative measures would provide adequate protection. Press-Enterprise petitioned the court of appeal for a writ of mandamus. The petition was denied. Press-Enterprise petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, which was granted.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)
Concurrence (Marshall, J.)
Concurrence (Stevens, J.)
Concurrence (Blackmun, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 606,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
