Prestonettes, Inc. v. Coty
United States Supreme Court
264 U.S. 359 (1924)
- Written by Sarah Holley, JD
Facts
Coty (plaintiff) brought suit against Prestonettes, Inc. (defendant) for trademark infringement, alleging that Prestonettes had made unlawful use of the L’Origin and Coty trademarks in selling genuine Coty face powder and perfume in rebottled and repackaged form, respectively. After purchasing genuine Coty face powder, Prestonettes would subject it to pressure, add a binder for coherence, and resell the compact in a metal case. Similarly, after purchasing genuine Coty perfume in bottles, Prestonettes would resell them in smaller bottles. The district court issued a decree that allowed Prestonettes to use the L’Origin and Coty trademarks on the labels of its products so long as Prestonettes also included a disclaimer that the products were not connected with Coty and were independently rebottled or repackaged (as applicable) in New York. The circuit court of appeals reversed and issued an absolute injunction against Prestonettes’ use of the L’Origin and Coty trademarks. Prestonettes challenged the decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Holmes, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.