Priestly v. Fowler
Court of Exchequer
150 Eng. Rep. 1030 (1837)
- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
Priestly (plaintiff), an employee of local butcher Fowler (defendant), was injured when an overloaded van carrying Fowler’s products overturned while Priestly and a coworker were making a delivery. Priestly sued Fowler and alleged that Fowler owed Priestly a duty to use due-and-proper care, that the van should have been in a proper state of repair, and that the van should not have been overloaded. Priestly further alleged that Fowler’s failure in those duties resulted in the van breaking down and Priestly being thrown to the ground and severely injured. The trial court awarded Priestly damages after finding that Priestly’s injuries were caused by the van being overloaded and that Fowler knew about it. The following term, a motion to arrest the judgment for an insufficient declaration was made on the grounds that Fowler owed no duty to Priestly.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lord Abinger, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.