Primary Investments, LLC v. Wee Tender Care III, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
323 Ga. App. 196 (2013)
- Written by Casey Cohen, JD
Facts
Marguerite O’Brien, Kelli O’Brien, and Erin O’Brien (defendants) were the members and managers of Primary Prep Academy, LLC (Primary) (defendant), which was operated by Wee Tender Care III, Inc. (Wee) (plaintiff). In 2008, Martin Nixon and Stephenie Nixon of N&N Holdings, LLC (NNH) (plaintiff) told the O’Briens that the Nixons were interested in buying Primary. An asset-purchase agreement (APA) was signed between Primary as the seller and NNH as the buyer. Marguerite signed the APA on behalf of Primary, and the Nixons signed on behalf of NNH. Although Marguerite signed the APA on behalf of Primary, the O’Briens were not individually named in the APA and did not individually execute the APA. The APA contained a noncompetition clause providing that “neither [Primary] nor its agents” would solicit any clients for a one-year period or open a childcare facility within a 10-mile radius of NNH. In 2010, the O’Briens formed a new entity, East Cobb Children’s Academy, LLC (East Cobb) (defendant), and opened a new childcare facility within a 10-mile radius of NNH. NNH and Wee brought suit against Primary and the O’Briens, alleging that the O’Briens were personally bound to the noncompetition clause in the APA and had violated the noncompetition clause by opening East Cobb. The trial court granted partial summary judgment to the plaintiffs. The defendants appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McMillian, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.