Prince George’s County v. Greenbelt Homes, Inc.
Maryland Court of Special Appeals
431 A.2d 745 (1981)
- Written by Mary Katherine Cunningham, JD
Facts
John Hemphill and Lynn Bradley jointly contracted to purchase a unit from a cooperative housing unit run by Greenbelt Homes, Inc. (defendant) in Prince George’s County, Maryland. The contract was subject to a provision requiring Greenbelt Homes, Inc., to accept Hemphill and Bradley as members. However, Greenbelt Homes, Inc., denied Hemphill and Bradley a membership on the ground that they were not married. Hemphill and Bradley filed a complaint to the Human Relations Commission of Prince George’s County, which reviewed the contract. The contract contained a covenant that members of Greenbelt Homes’ cooperative housing unit were to occupy the unit with “himself and his immediate family.” The commission rejected the generally accepted interpretation of family offered by Greenbelt Homes. The commission took notice of the dictionary definition of family as including “a group of individuals living under one roof.” The commission also reviewed local ordinances, holding that up to five unrelated individuals could live together in a single household unit. The commission concluded the covenant, as interpreted to limit membership to married couples, was invalid under a local ordinance against discrimination of an individual based on marital status. Prince George’s County (plaintiff) filed a suit for declaratory judgment and mandatory injunction in circuit court to enforce the order of the commission. Both parties submitted motions for summary judgment. The trial court granted Greenbelt Homes’ motion, holding that the ordinance did not prevent Greenbelt Homes from limiting its memberships to married couples. Prince George’s County appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lowe, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.