Prizant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

30 T.C.M. (CCH) 817 (1971)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Prizant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
30 T.C.M. (CCH) 817 (1971)

KS

Facts

In May 1958, H.G. Prizant and Company (the corporation) was formed and received significant assets and business activity from H.G. Prizant and Co. (the partnership). In January 1963, the corporation increased its capital structure, which included offering 420 shares of stock to the partnership for the cancellation of $42,000 of debts. At that time, the partnership was not conducting any business but did exist. On June 30, 1964, the partnership transferred the shares of the corporation. to Jerome Prizant and two other partners. More than a year later, the corporation became insolvent and the shares became valueless. On their 1965 joint tax return, Jerome and Doris Prizant (plaintiffs) claimed an ordinary loss deduction in the amount of $10,500 based on the worthlessness of the corporation’s stock. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the commissioner) (defendant) disallowed the deduction, as the Prizants were not the initial owners of the stock. The Prizants argued that the partnership had already been terminated when the stock was issued to it and that they were the initial recipients of the shares. The Prizants appealed to United States Tax Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Simpson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 824,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership