Pro-Football, Inc. v. Uhlenhake

558 S.E. 2d 571 (Va. App. 2002)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pro-Football, Inc. v. Uhlenhake

Virginia Court of Appeals
558 S.E. 2d 571 (Va. App. 2002)

Facts

Jeffrey Uhlenhake (plaintiff) was employed as an offensive lineman for Pro-Football, Inc. (defendant). Uhlenhake’s employment duties include training, practicing, and playing in football games. Uhlenhake sustained injuries to his left foot and knee while playing in a regularly scheduled game. Uhlenhake filed a claim with the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Commission (the commission) seeking disability benefits. The commission awarded Uhlenhake permanent partial-disability benefits for his foot injury but denied benefits for his knee injury. Both parties appealed the commission’s determination. Pro-Football argued that injuries sustained by professional football players were not compensable under the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Act because such injuries either result from voluntary activities or are foreseeable and therefore not accidental within the meaning of the act.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Benton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership