Probate of Marcus

509 A.2d 1, 199 Conn. 524 (1986)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Probate of Marcus

Connecticut Supreme Court
509 A.2d 1, 199 Conn. 524 (1986)

Facts

Ida Betzes was a 90-year-old woman who was incapacitated due to old age. A Connecticut probate court appointed Betzes’s daughters, Phyllis Marcus (plaintiff) and Selma Anderson (plaintiff), as Betzes’s conservators. At the time, Betzes had nearly $600,000 in assets as well as additional income for her support. Between 1976 and 1979, Marcus and Anderson gave away nearly all of Betzes’s assets to Betzes’s children and grandchildren. Once Betzes’s assets were below the threshold for Medicaid eligibility, Marcus applied to the department of income maintenance for Medicaid on Betzes’s behalf. The department of human resources, after learning of the gifts that had depleted Betzes’s assets, filed a petition in probate court as an interested party for an accounting of Betzes’s estate. Following a hearing, the probate court disallowed the gifts because Connecticut law did not give conservators the power to make gifts. The department of income maintenance then denied Marcus’s application for Medicaid, reasoning that if the gifts were disallowed, then Betzes no longer qualified for Medicaid benefits. Marcus and Anderson appealed, arguing that the gifts were authorized under Connecticut law and that the doctrine of substituted judgment applied. Marcus and Anderson further argued that because federal law at the time of the transfers invalidated transfer-of-assets restrictions on Medicaid eligibility, Betzes would have qualified for Medicaid benefits if she had made the gifts herself.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dannehy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership