Proceedings Concerning the Constitutional Complaint of L … GmbH
German Federal Constitutional Court
34 I.L.M. 986 (1994)
- Written by Sara Adams, JD
Facts
A limited-liability company (the LLC) (plaintiff) established in Berlin had a subsidiary United States corporation (the subsidiary). The subsidiary and Traditional Medicinals, Inc., entered a distribution contract for pharmaceuticals. After issues arose from the distribution relationship, Traditional Medicinals sued both the LLC and the United States subsidiary, seeking punitive damages. Traditional Medicinals served the subsidiary in the United States but was unable to serve the LLC. Traditional Medicinals requested that the Governmental Administration for Justice (the GAJ) in Berlin serve the LLC under the terms of the Hague Service Convention (the convention). The GAJ agreed to assist and sent Traditional Medicinals’ complaint to the local court. The LLC filed an action in the Berlin Court of Appeal requesting that the court lift the GAJ order for judicial assistance. The court of appeal rejected the request, and the LLC appealed to the German Federal Constitutional Court. The LLC argued that the order granting Traditional Medicinals judicial assistance in serving the LLC violated the LLC’s civil rights under German Basic Law, that the court of appeal failed to consider the fact that punitive damages violate fundamental principles of German law, and that German authorities may not assist with a foreign proceeding if the judgment sought conflicts with German law, even if that assistance is only related to initiating the action.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.