Logourl black
From our private database of 13,000+ case briefs...

Professional Bull Riders, Inc. v. AutoZone, Inc.

Colorado Supreme Court
113 P.3d 757 (2005)


Facts

AutoZone, Inc. (AutoZone) (defendant) sponsored events put on by Professional Bull Riders (PBR) (plaintiff). PBR presented AutoZone with a written agreement securing AutoZone’s sponsorship for 2001 and 2002. The agreement stated AutoZone’s sponsorship would begin on December 20, 2000 and end on December 31, 2002. AutoZone could terminate the agreement early, however, by providing written notice of termination no later than August 15, 2001. AutoZone did not sign the agreement, but PBR alleges AutoZone’s actions indicated acceptance of these terms. In January 2002, AutoZone notified PBR that it would not be sponsoring PBR’s events in 2002. AutoZone alleges that despite this notice, PBR continued to use AutoZone’s trade name and logo in its programs. PBR brought suit against AutoZone in United States district court for breach of its oral sponsorship agreement. Speedbar, one of AutoZone’s subsidiaries, intervened. AutoZone and Speedbar filed counterclaims alleging service and trademark infringement, unfair competition, and service mark dilution. The district court granted AutoZone’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that the oral contract between AutoZone and PBR could not be performed within one year. Since the contract provided for a term of two years, the district court held it unenforceable under the Colorado statute of frauds. PBR appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The Tenth Circuit submitted a certified question about the interpretation of the Colorado Statute of Frauds to the Colorado Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Coats, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 128,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,000 briefs, keyed to 176 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.