Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Professional Massage Training Center, Inc. v. Accreditation Alliance of Career Schools and Colleges

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
781 F.3d 161 (2015)


Facts

The Professional Massage Training Center (PMTC) (plaintiff) was a single-discipline massage-therapy training school in Springfield, Missouri. The Accreditation Alliance of Career Schools and Colleges (ACCSC) (defendant) was a non-profit corporation that accredits private schools of higher education offering career-oriented programs. ACCSC established standards of accreditation that established the criteria schools must meet to obtain and maintain accreditation. Accreditation from ACCSC is necessary to receive Title VI federal student-aid funding. ACCSC determined that PMTC had many issues when PMTC applied for a renewal of its accreditation. These issues included problems with management capability and retention of administrative staff, failures in strategic planning, lack of professional development, failure to demonstrate adequate student achievement and employment rates, and deficiencies in the processes for verification of faculty credentials. Therefore, ACCSC denied the application for renewal of PMTC’s accreditation. PMTC appealed the decision to an independent appeals panel, which affirmed the denial. PMTC then sued ACCSC under various common-law theories for denying the application. The trial court determined that ACCSC violated PMTC’s due-process rights and awarded $429,016.62 in damages. ACCSC appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Wilkinson, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.