ProGrowth Bank, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
558 F.3d 809 (2009)
On September 8, 2005, Global One Financial, Inc. (Global One) (defendant) loaned Christopher Hanson and/or the Christopher Hanson Insurance Agency (Agency) $1 million pursuant to a promissory note. This promissory note was supported by a security agreement, which pledged two separate annuity contracts issued by Fidelity and Guaranty Life Insurance Company (Fidelity). The two annuity contracts were identified as L9E00015 and L9E00016. As an agent of Global One, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo) (defendant) filed a financing statement on September 8, 2005. The financing statement described the collateral as “All of Debtor’s right, title, and interest in and to, assets and rights of Debtor . . . , and all proceeds and products in that certain Annuity Contract No. LE900015 issued by Lincoln Benefit Life in the name of Debtor.” This financing statement contained two errors: the number of the contract and the issuing party. Eight days later, Wells Fargo filed an additional filing statement that corrected the number of the annuity contract but did not correct the issuing party. On February 9, 2006, ProGrowth Bank, Inc. (ProGrowth) (plaintiff) entered into a loan agreement with Hanson. Hanson again pledged his interest in the two annuity contracts as collateral for the loan. A few days later, ProGrowth filed a financing statement that correctly identified the annuity contracts and the issuing party. ProGrowth sued, seeking a declaratory judgment that its security interest was superior to the security interest of Global One and Wells Fargo. The district judge granted summary judgment to ProGrowth, because the earlier financing statements were seriously misleading. Wells Fargo and Global One appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bye, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.