Promaulayko v. Johns Manville Sales Corporation
Supreme Court of New Jersey
562 A.2d 202 (1989)
![SC](https://quimbee-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/educator/photo/11/Sean_Carroll.webp)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
John Promaulayko died as a result of asbestosis he contracted while working for Ruberoid Corporation (Ruberoid). There were no warnings regarding the dangers of asbestos on the bags of asbestos Promaulayko handled. Ruberoid had purchased its asbestos from Leonard J. Buck, Inc. (Buck) (defendant), which had purchased the asbestos from Amtorg Trading Corporation (Amtorg) (defendant). Amtorg was not the manufacturer of the asbestos, but was formed to promote trade between the United States and the Soviet Union, where the asbestos at issue was originally manufactured. Amtorg’s employees were Soviet citizens living in the United States. Neither Buck nor Amtorg ever had physical possession of the asbestos. Promaulayko’s wife (plaintiff) filed a products-liability suit against Buck and Amtorg. The jury found that all of the asbestos Buck sold to Ruberoid was provided by Amtorg. Based on this, the trial court granted Buck indemnification from Amtorg. The appellate court reversed, ruling that Buck could obtain indemnification only from the original manufacturer, not from an intermediate distributor like Amtorg. Buck appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pollock, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.