Prosecutor v. Al-Senussi
Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Court
Case No. ICC-01/11-01/11
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
The International Criminal Court (ICC) is a permanent court that deals with international criminal issues and was established by the Rome Statute in the 1990s. The Rome Statute, a multilateral treaty, outlines various provisions and procedures related to ICC jurisdiction and operation. Since the ICC’s creation, various challenges to ICC jurisdiction have ensued. During a 2011 rebellion against Libya’s government, the United Nations Security Council referred various issues related to the rebellion to the ICC. The ICC issued arrest warrants for three high-ranking Libyan officials, including the leader of the intelligence branch, Abdullah Al-Senussi (defendant), charging the officials with crimes against humanity. Shortly thereafter, Libya wished to commence its own prosecutions against the officials, and filed an application challenging the admissibility of the case, or the jurisdiction of the ICC under Article 17 of the Rome Statute. In 2013, the ICC’s Pre-Trial Chamber accepted Libya’s jurisdictional challenge to Al-Senussi’s case. Al-Senussi appealed, arguing that his case was admissible in the ICC under the Article 17(2) exception because Libya’s proceedings would not satisfy international due-process standards and, therefore, Libya was unwilling to genuinely prosecute.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.