Prosecutor v. Delalic
International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Trial Chamber
Case No. IT-96-21T, T. Ch. Ilqtr (16 November 1998)
- Written by Deanna Curl, JD
Facts
In 1992, Zejnil Delalic and three other men (defendants) worked at a detention facility in the village of Celebici during the conflict in the former territory of Yugoslavia (the former Yugoslavia). In May 1993, the United Nations Security Council established the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY). The ICTY was given the authority to indict and prosecute individuals alleged to have violated international humanitarian laws during the conflict. An indictment against the defendants was issued in March 1996 for incidents that occurred at the Celebici detention facility. The defendants were charged with violations of the laws and customs of war and grave violations of the Geneva Convention based on unlawful confinements, numerous killings, and physical and sexual assaults that occurred at the detention facility. One of the defendants was alleged to have been directly involved with some of the crimes, whereas the other three defendants were charged because they were superiors to subordinates who committed criminal acts. A 19-month trial commenced in March 1997, and the trial chamber judgment was issued on November 16, 1998.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.