Prousalis v. Moore
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
751 F.3d 272 (2014)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
Thomas Prousalis (defendant) was a securities lawyer. Prousalis represented Busybox.com, Inc. (Busybox) during the process of conducting an initial public offering (IPO). At some point, Busybox was in a precarious financial position. The outlook of the IPO was uncertain, so Prousalis implemented a scheme to ensure that the IPO went through. The scheme involved failing to disclose improper compensation structures and other maneuvers that would have prevented completion of the IPO had they been reported properly to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Prousalis was indicted and charged with several counts of fraud in a criminal case. Prousalis pleaded guilty. Later, Prousalis filed a writ of habeas corpus, arguing that the conduct for which he was convicted was no longer criminal based on a prior United States Supreme Court decision, Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wilkinson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

