Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
51 Cal. 3d 674, 274 Cal. Rptr. 387, 798 P.2d 1230 (1990)
Trustees of a family trust (insureds) built an apartment house and insured it with four successive property insurers between 1971 and 1986. Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance (Prudential) insured the property between 1977 and 1980, with a policy that contained the statutory one-year limitations period requiring notice within 60 days after a loss and an exclusion for earth-movement damage. While replacing flooring in November 1985, the insureds discovered an extensive crack in the building’s foundation. Prudential concluded that expansive soil caused the building’s foundation to rupture. In August 1987, just before receiving formal written notice that Prudential was denying the insureds’ claim under the exclusion, the insureds sued Prudential and three other insurers that had insured the property between 1971 and 1986. Prudential sought summary judgment after discovering that when carpet was installed in 1982 that covered the damaged area, the insureds observed no damage—and this was two years after Prudential’s coverage had ended. Prudential also claimed that because the insureds filed suit more than 20 months after filing their claim, the action was time-barred under the one-year limitations period. The trial court denied Prudential’s motion, and Prudential sought a writ of mandamus in the appellate court, arguing the limitations and failure-to-give-timely-notice defenses. The court of appeal directed the trial court to grant Prudential relief. The insureds and Prudential appealed the one-year suit provision and successive-insurer issues, respectively.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lucas, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 707,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 707,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.