Public Citizen v. Young

831 F.2d 1108 (1987)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Public Citizen v. Young

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
831 F.2d 1108 (1987)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Congress passed the Color Additive Amendments of 1960 to provide the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority to regulate the use of color additives in consumer products. The FDA listed two dyes, Orange No. 17 and Red No. 19, as safe even after studies showed these substances caused cancer in test animals, albeit at extremely low levels. The risk of cancer for Orange No. 17 was one in 19 billion. The risk of cancer for Red No. 19 was one in nine million. The FDA’s reasoning for concluding the two dyes were safe was that any lifetime risk lower than one in one million met the requirements for a de minimis exception to the Delaney Clause. The Delaney Clause of the Color Additive Amendments provided that any additive that induces cancers in laboratory animals must be denied listing as safe. The application of the Delaney Clause is strict compared to all other safety hazards that are not carcinogens, which instead undergo a multifactored risk-balancing analysis. The listing of the two dyes as safe by the FDA was challenged in the United States District Court. The nonprofit group Public Citizen (plaintiff) appealed to United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Williams, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 824,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership