Public Lands Council v. Babbitt

167 F.3d 1287 (1999)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Public Lands Council v. Babbitt

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
167 F.3d 1287 (1999)

Facts

The Secretary of the Interior (the secretary) (defendant) issued new regulations governing the administration of livestock grazing on public lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management. One of these regulations (the conservation-use rule) permitted the secretary to issue Taylor Grazing Act (TGA) permits for conservation use. The regulation defined conservation use as an activity other than livestock grazing conducted on an allotment for conservation purposes. Thus, the regulation authorized the secretary to issue conservation permits that prohibited grazing for the duration of the permit. Prior to the regulation, the secretary had been permitted to temporarily limit grazing to preserve and protect the land. The Public Lands Council (the council) (plaintiff) challenged the conservation-use rule, arguing that it was facially invalid because, in issuing the rule, the secretary had exceeded his authority under the TGA, the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA), and the Public Rangelands Improvement Act of 1978 (PRIA). The district court held that the conservation-use rule was invalid and enjoined its enforcement. The secretary appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Seymour, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership