Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Puerto Rico Sun Oil Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
3 F.3d 73 (1993)


Facts

The federal Clean Water Act (Act) prohibited the discharge of pollutants into protected waters, unless the discharger first obtained: (1) state certification and (2) a permit from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (defendant). For purposes of the Act, Puerto Rico was a state. Puerto Rico Sun Oil Company (Sun) (plaintiff) sought Puerto Rico's certification and an EPA permit for Sun's discharges. State governments and the EPA usually allowed dischargers to measure their discharges in a mixed zone. Mixed-zone measurement was of vital importance to Sun. After an unusually long and mistake-ridden process, Puerto Rico certified Sun's application. However, Puerto Rico’s certificate omitted any mixed-zone provision. It was unclear if the omission was deliberate, a mistake, or maybe related to an ongoing review that Puerto Rico was conducting into its mixed-zone policy. At Sun's request, Puerto Rico agreed to complete the policy review and then consider revising Sun's certification to permit mixed-zone measurement. Puerto Rico provided the details of this agreement to the EPA. Although Puerto Rico eventually decided to revise Sun's certification and allow mixed-zone measurement, the EPA issued a permit to Sun before Puerto Rico made that decision. The EPA permit omitted a mixed-zone provision. Sun asked the EPA to review that omission. After review, the EPA still refused to revise Sun's permit. Sun then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Boudin, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 178,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.