This website requires JavaScript. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings, or use a different web browser like Google Chrome or Safari.

Options

From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...

Pulley v. Harris

United States Supreme Court

465 U.S. 37, 104 S. Ct. 871, 79 L. Ed. 2d 29 (1984)

Facts

Harris (defendant) received a death sentence from a California court. The California death-penalty statute did not require comparative proportionality review, which requires a court to compare death sentences to the sentences imposed for similar crimes. The statute did require proof of aggravating circumstances before a death sentence could be imposed. The statute also provided for mandatory judicial review of a jury’s findings in order to make an independent determination that the sentence was supported by the evidence. The judge was required to state on the record reasons for denying modification of the jury’s sentence. The California statute granted an automatic appeal for all death sentences. Harris appealed to the California Supreme Court, which upheld the state’s death-penalty statute. Harris’s first appeal to the United States Supreme Court was denied certiorari. Harris filed for habeas corpus relief in federal court. The district court denied relief. The court of appeals issued a writ to the California Supreme Court, requiring the sentence to be vacated unless it conducted a proportionality review. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
The procedural disposition (e.g., reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 540,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.
Unlock this case brief Read our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.
Learn about our approach Read more about Quimbee

Here's why 540,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Here's why 540,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
26,900 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
Uniform format for every case brief
Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
Top-notch customer support