Pulliam v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
73 T.C.M. 3052 (1997)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Clark Pulliam (plaintiff) was the president and sole shareholder of Pulliam Funeral Homes, P.C., which had a location in Oblong, Illinois. Earl Deckard was the manager and embalmer at this facility. Deckard wanted to acquire stock in Pulliam Funeral Homes, but he had disagreements with Pulliam. Deckard purchased property with the intent of constructing and operating a funeral home of his own. Pulliam wished to prevent both the establishment of a competing funeral home in Oblong and the loss of a key employee. Pulliam and Deckard entered an agreement under which the Oblong facility’s assets were transferred to a spin-off business, Pulliam Deckard Funeral Chapel, P.C. (Chapel). Pulliam Funeral Homes distributed all stock in Chapel to Pulliam, but a stock-purchase agreement provided for Deckard to acquire 49 percent of the Chapel shares for a total of $386,610, payable mostly in annual installments. Deckard also agreed not to compete with Pulliam Funeral Homes. Deckard later defaulted on his payments, his employment ended, and Pulliam reacquired almost all the Chapel stock. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the commissioner) (defendant) assessed a deficiency against Pulliam on unreported dividends of $789,500, the total fair market value of the Oblong facility. Pulliam challenged the commissioner’s assessment in the United States Tax Court. In addition to the twin purposes of preventing competition from Deckard and retaining Deckard as an employee, Pulliam contended that Illinois law required funeral homes to be professional-service corporations with licensed funeral directors and embalmers as shareholders.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Dawson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

