Pullin v. Superior Court

8 Cal. App. 4th 1161, 97 Cal. Rptr. 2d 447 (2000)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pullin v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal
8 Cal. App. 4th 1161, 97 Cal. Rptr. 2d 447 (2000)

JL

Facts

Lincoln Pullin (plaintiff) slipped and fell at a Vons Market that was operated by The Vons Companies, Inc. (Vons) (defendant). Pullin sued Vons, alleging a cause of action for negligence. Pullin retained Ralph Engdahl, a forensic safety engineer, as an expert witness on the issue of liability. Vons scheduled a deposition of Engdahl, and Pullin requested permission from Vons for Engdahl to perform tests on the floor at the Vons Market. Vons refused to give permission for the floor inspection and testing and scolded Pullin for not following the discovery rules governing requests for inspection. The day before his deposition, Engdahl visited the Vons Market where the slip-and-fall occurred while it was open for business. Engdahl used a small machine to conduct a test on the floor where Pullin had slipped. Engdahl also purchased an item and left the store approximately 15 minutes after he arrived. The test did not damage the floor, and no one asked Engdahl to leave. Based on this test, Engdahl was prepared to testify that, when wet, the floor’s co-efficient of friction was below acceptable safety standards. Vons learned about this test during the deposition the following day. Vons then filed a motion in limine asking the trial court to exclude Engdahl’s testimony from trial based on abuse of the discovery process. The trial court granted the motion, and Pullin appealed to the California Court of Appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Vogel, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 743,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 743,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 743,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership