Pulmosan Safety Equipment Corporation v. Barnes

752 So. 2d 556 (2000)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pulmosan Safety Equipment Corporation v. Barnes

Florida Supreme Court
752 So. 2d 556 (2000)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Earl Barnes (defendant), a sandblaster, used sand manufactured by Pulmosan Safety Equipment Corporation (PSEC) (plaintiff) for his sandblasting activities from 1972 through 1974. PSEC’s sand contained silica dust. In 1984, Barnes’s left lung was surgically removed because he had contracted actinomycosis, a fungal lung infection caused by silicosis. Silicosis is a lung disease caused by exposure to silica dust. Barnes did not know that actinomycosis was related to silica-dust exposure until 1992, and Barnes did not receive a confirmed silicosis diagnosis until 1995. Barnes then filed a products-liability lawsuit against PSEC, alleging that because PSEC’s sand contained silica dust, it had caused or contributed to his silicosis and related lung removal. PSEC challenged, arguing that Barnes’s claim was barred by the 12-year statute of repose applicable to products-liability actions. Florida’s products-liability statute of repose was repealed in 1986; however, it was still applicable to claims arising from pre-repeal tortious conduct. The trial court dismissed Barnes’s claim, holding that it was time-barred. Barnes appealed. The appellate court reversed, holding that Barnes’s claim was not time-barred because (1) Barnes’s silicosis was a latent injury; and (2) the latent-injury exception therefore stopped the running of the applicable 12-year statute of repose until Barnes received the confirmed silicosis diagnosis in 1995. PSEC appealed to the Florida Supreme Court, arguing that the latent-injury exception did not apply to the products-liability statute of repose.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pariente, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership