Pulsifer v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
64 T.C. 245 (1975)
In 1969, Stephen Pulsifer, Susan Pulsifer, and Thomas Pulsifer (plaintiffs) won the Irish Hospital Sweepstakes (Sweepstakes). Because the Pulsifers were minor children, their winnings were deposited with an Irish court in an interest-bearing account. The money could not be released until the children turned 21 years old or until an application to the Irish court was made on the children’s behalf by their legal representative. In a later year, the Pulsifers’ father petitioned the Irish court for the release of the children’s winnings. The federal tax commissioner (commissioner) (defendant) determined a deficiency for the Pulsifers for the 1969 tax year, holding that the children’s winnings should have been included in their gross income for that year. The Pulsifers petitioned the United States Tax Court for a redetermination, arguing that their winnings should instead be taxed in the year that they received the money.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hall, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 709,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 709,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.