Pumpelly v. Green Bay Company
United States Supreme Court
80 U.S. 166 (1872)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Pumpelly (plaintiff) owned hundreds of acres of farmland close to the Fox River, the northern outlet of Lake Winnebago in Wisconsin. Before Wisconsin became a state, work was started on the construction of a dam on the river near the lake. The Green Bay Company (defendant) came to own the dam works from its original developers. After Wisconsin became a state, its legislature adopted the plan for the dam and enacted legislation in support of the dam as part of an effort to improve navigation in the region. After the dam was completed, the water behind the dam rose to such a level that it forcibly flooded Pumpelly’s farmland. The flooding completely destroyed the usefulness of Pumpelly’s land. Pumpelly sued, alleging that the damage to the usefulness and value of his land caused by the flooding from the dam amounted to a taking by the state for which he was entitled to compensation.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Miller, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.