Purcell v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
656 F.3d 463 (2011)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Someone notified Navy and Department of Defense (DOD) personnel (collectively the defendants) that Christopher Lee Purcell had a gun and planned to commit suicide. The defendants arrived at Purcell’s barracks at the Brunswick Naval Air Station and briefly questioned him. The defendants did not find a gun, and later allowed Purcell to go to the bathroom accompanied by a friend. Upon entering the bathroom, Purcell pulled a gun from his waistband and shot himself in the chest. Purcell’s father, Michael (plaintiff), brought a wrongful death suit against the defendants in federal district court under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). Michael’s complaint alleged that the defendants failed to calm Purcell, failed to search him in accordance with Navy regulations, and failed to maintain proper custody of him. The district court dismissed Michael’s suit as being barred by the Feres doctrine. Michael appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Flaum, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.