Pushkin v. Regents of the University of Colorado
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
658 F.2d 1372 (1981)
Joshua Pushkin (plaintiff) was a medical doctor who sought admission into a psychiatric residency program at the University of Colorado (the University) (defendant). Pushkin suffered from multiple sclerosis (MS) and was confined to a wheelchair. Pushkin had completed a year of residency in psychiatry and was practicing medicine with an emphasis on psychiatry when he applied to the University. Pushkin attended 45-minute interviews with Drs. Carter, Weissberg, Scully, and Barchilon as part of the admissions process. Each of the interviewers expressed concerns about Pushkin’s disability in interview notes. The interviewers assumed, based on the short interviews, that Pushkin was angry and emotional to the point that he would not be effective; that Pushkin’s use of medicine to treat MS would result in side effects including difficulties with delirium, judgment, and memory; and also that Pushkin would miss too much time away from patients in order to receive treatment for his MS. However, Pushkin had provided a letter from a former supervisor that praised Pushkin’s previous work. Pushkin’s physician stated that Pushkin’s treatments could be planned in advance. The University rejected Pushkin’s application. The chairman of the University, Dr. Carter, told Pushkin that the University’s decision was based on Pushkin’s MS. Pushkin sued the University, alleging a violation of § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. The district court ruled that the University violated § 504 and entered an injunction requiring the University to admit Pushkin into the next class of the psychiatric residency program. The University appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Doyle, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.