PW Ventures v. Nichols
Florida Supreme Court
533 So. 2d 281 (1988)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
PW Ventures (plaintiff) was a Florida corporation that was regulated as a public utility. PW Ventures sought to construct, own, and operate a combined-heat-and-power cogeneration power plant. PW Ventures signed a letter of intent to provide electric and thermal power to Pratt and Whitney (Pratt). PW Ventures was to build a cogeneration plant on land leased from Pratt and sell its electric output to Pratt under a long-term contract. Before construction commenced, PW Ventures requested that the Florida Public Service Commission (the commission) (defendant) issue a declaratory statement that PW Ventures would not be subject to the regulation of the commission as a public utility. However, the commission determined that PW Ventures would be regulated as a public utility under the terms of the proposed agreement between PW Ventures and Pratt. The commission examined the definition of public utility from the applicable statute, § 336.02(1) of the Florida Statutes. The definition classified every person or entity that supplied electricity or gas “to or for the public” as a public utility. The commission interpreted supplying electricity “to or for the public” to include sales to any member of the public. The commission reasoned that its interpretation was correct because the legislature specifically exempted from regulation direct sales of natural gas to industrial customers and water-sewer utility service to fewer than 100 persons, but it made no similar exemptions for electric service. PW Ventures appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Grimes, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.