Quake Construction, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.
Illinois Supreme Court
565 N.E.2d 990, 141 Ill. 2d 281 (1990)
- Written by Sarah Larkin, JD
Facts
American Airlines, Inc. (American) (defendant) hired Jones Brothers Construction Corporation (Jones) (defendant) to handle construction contracts for the expansion of American’s facilities at O’Hare International Airport. Jones sent Quake Construction, Inc. (Quake) (plaintiff) an invitation to bid on the project. Quake submitted its bid. Jones orally informed Quake that it would be awarded the contract and sent Quake a letter of intent. This letter included language indicating that Quake had been awarded the contract, that American was authorizing the work, and that work would begin in approximately four to 11 days after the date of the letter. The letter also provided a cancellation clause, which provided that Jones could cancel the letter of intent if the parties could not agree on a fully executed agreement. Jones and Quake entered into negotiations for a written form contract. At a preconstruction meeting, Jones announced that Quake would be the general contractor for the project. However, that same day, American informed Quake that its involvement with the project was terminated. Quake filed suit. American and Jones filed a motion to dismiss. The trial court granted the motion to dismiss, finding that Jones lawfully terminated the contract under the cancellation clause. Quake appealed. The appellate court found the letter of intent ambiguous as to the parties’ intent to be bound by it and reversed the trial court's dismissal. American and Jones appealed to the Illinois Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Calvo, J.)
Concurrence (Stamos, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.