Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Quality Inns International, Inc. v. McDonald’s Corporation

United States District Court for the District of Maryland
695 F. Supp. 198 (1988)


Facts

Quality Inns International, Inc. (Quality) (plaintiff) marketed a new chain of hotels to be called “McSleep Inn.” When Quality first announced its plans, the question “What will McDonald’s think?” repeatedly arose. McDonald’s Corporation (McDonald’s) (defendant) argued that Quality’s use of “McSleep” infringed on McDonald’s trademarks, which consist of the prefix “Mc” plus generic words. McDonald’s argued that Quality’s use of a similar mark would create confusion among consumers and that it would allow Quality to benefit from McDonald’s goodwill and reputation. Both McDonald’s and Quality conducted surveys of potential consumers. In McDonald’s surveys, the confusion rate of consumers was over 30 percent. In Quality’s surveys, the confusion rate was lower due to the fact that Quality showed the potential consumers photos that included Quality’s name with the “McSleep” brand. Even then, the confusion rate was 16.3 percent. Quality filed for a declaratory judgment stating that “McSleep” did not infringe on McDonald’s trademarks. McDonald’s counterclaimed for trademark infringement, unfair competition, and dilution.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Niemeyer, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.