United States Supreme Court
289 U.S. 466 (1933)
Mr. Quercia (defendant) was charged with violating federal narcotics law. At trial, Quercia testified in his own defense and generally denied all charges. At the end of the trial, the judge instructed the jury on the presumption of innocence and reasonable doubt. The judge then told the jury what the judge thought about Quercia’s testimony. The judge said that Quercia wiped his hands while he testified, which the judge believed was almost always an indication that a person was lying. The judge stated that his opinion was fact, and added that he thought every word Quercia had said was a lie. Finally, the judge told the jury that his opinion was not binding and that if the jury disagreed, the jury had a duty to find that Quercia was not guilty. The jury convicted Quercia. Quercia appealed his conviction, and the court of appeals affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted Quercia’s petition for writ of certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hughes, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.