Quigley v. KPMG Peat Marwick, LLP
Appellate Division of Superior Court of New Jersey
749 A.2d 405 (2000)
Joseph Quigley (plaintiff) worked for KPMG Peat Marwick, LLP (KPMG) (defendant) for 18 years. In 1981 and 1984, Quigley was promoted, first to manager and then to senior manager. Each time, Quigley was asked to sign an employment agreement as a condition of his continued employment. Quigley needed the job to support his family. Quigley signed the agreements to avoid losing his job, but inserted “U.D.” into his signature to signify that the agreement was signed under duress. The employment agreements contained a provision requiring arbitration of all claims. Quigley was eventually terminated by KPMG, and sued KPMG for age discrimination. The trial court dismissed the complaint and ordered arbitration. Quigley appealed to the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey Superior Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Havey, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.