Quilloin v. Walcott

434 U.S. 246, 98 S. Ct. 549, 54 L. Ed. 2d 511 (1978)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Quilloin v. Walcott

United States Supreme Court
434 U.S. 246, 98 S. Ct. 549, 54 L. Ed. 2d 511 (1978)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD
Play video

Facts

In 1976, Randall Walcott (plaintiff) filed a petition to adopt the child his wife, Ardell Williams, had with Leon Webster Quilloin (defendant) in 1964. Although Quilloin was the biological father, he had never filed for legitimation prior to the adoption petition and he provided support to the child on an irregular basis. The child had always been in Williams’s custody and had been living in the home Walcott and Williams shared since they married in 1967. After Walcott filed the adoption petition, Quilloin filed a petition for legitimation, for visitation rights, and to object to the adoption. A trial court held a hearing, during which the child informed the judge that he wanted to be adopted by Walcott. The trial court found that Walcott was a fit and proper person to adopt the child. Although the court did not find that Quilloin was an unfit parent, it granted the adoption petition after concluding it was in the best interest of the child. The trial court also held that because Quilloin never previously filed a court order for legitimation, he did not have standing to object to the adoption under Georgia law because only the mother’s consent is needed for the adoption of an illegitimate child and until the child is legitimated, only the mother has the power to veto the adoption. Quilloin appealed, arguing that the adoption statute violated the Due Process Clause and Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 829,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 829,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 829,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership