Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Quintana-Ruiz v. Hyundai Motor Corp.

303 F.3d 62 (2002)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 34,000+ case briefs...

Quintana-Ruiz v. Hyundai Motor Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

303 F.3d 62 (2002)

Facts

Ines Reyes-Quintana was riding in the passenger seat of a car manufactured by Hyundai Motor Corporation (Hyundai) (defendant), when the car rear-ended the car in front of it at a speed differential of 30 miles per hour. The passenger-side airbag in the Hyundai deployed, breaking Reyes-Quintana’s arm. Evidence indicated that Reyes-Quintana was wearing a seat belt at the time. Quintana-Ruiz (plaintiff), Reyes-Quintana’s mother, brought a design-defect suit against Hyundai on Reyes-Quintana’s behalf. Quintana-Ruiz argued that the airbag should have been designed to deploy only at a higher barrier equivalent velocity (BEV), which is the speed at which a car hits another object. In effect, Quintana-Ruiz argued that Reyes-Quintana would not have incurred as grievous an injury if the airbag had not deployed. During trial, Hyundai presented expert testimony that, if the airbags had been designed to deploy at a higher BEV, there would be many accidents in which individuals would be seriously injured due to the airbags’ failure to deploy, particularly in the case of individuals who were not wearing seat belts. Federal law required that airbags be designed to protect individuals, regardless of whether they are wearing seat belts. Experts also testified that, although airbags may have caused injuries, they have also saved thousands of lives. Hyundai conceded that Quintana-Ruiz met her burden of establishing that the airbag’s design was the proximate cause of the injury but argued that the benefits of the design of the airbags outweighed the risk of danger inherent in the design. The jury found in favor Quintana-Ruiz, and Hyundai appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lynch, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 607,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 34,000 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 34,000 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership