Quiroz v. Alcoa, Inc.
Arizona Supreme Court
416 P.3d 824 (2018)
- Written by Tanya Munson, JD
Facts
In October 2014, Ernest V. Quiroz died from mesothelioma. Mesothelioma is a form of cancer associated with asbestos exposure. Quiroz’s surviving wife, children, and parents (the family) (plaintiffs) filed suit against Reynolds Metal Company, Alcoa, Inc., and Reywest Development Company (Reynolds) (defendant), alleging that Reynolds negligently caused Quiroz’s death by failing to protect Quiroz from second-hand asbestos exposure. Quiroz lived with his father as a minor from 1952 to 1970. Quiroz’s father had worked at a plant owned by Reynolds from 1948 until 1983. Quiroz’s father worked with asbestos, and his clothes were contaminated with asbestos fibers. When Quiroz’s father came home, Quiroz was exposed to the asbestos fibers on his father’s clothes. The family alleged that Reynolds breached their duty to protect Quiroz from take-home asbestos by failing to warn his father about the dangers of secondary asbestos exposure, failing to provide his father with safety equipment, and failing to take necessary safety measures to protect Quiroz from exposure. The family argued that the court should recognize a duty based on § 7 and § 54 of the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Liability for Physical and Emotional Harm (Third Restatement), which provided that a duty exists for landowners for artificial conditions or conduct on the land that poses a risk of potential harm to persons not on the land.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gould, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.