R.B. v. Mastery Charter School
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
762 F. Supp. 2d 745 (2010)

- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
R.B. was a teenager with Down’s syndrome who attended Mastery Charter School (Mastery) (defendant), a public charter school operating within the School District of Philadelphia (the district) (defendant). As a result of her disability and associated medical conditions, R.B. was frequently absent from school. Mastery modified her schedule to accommodate this and did not track her absenteeism, although there was a state law in place requiring schools to disenroll students who were absent for a certain number of days. After a conflict between Mastery personnel and R.B.’s mother (plaintiff), R.B.’s mother initiated an administrative appeal against Mastery. Around the same time, Mastery began recording R.B.’s absences and then unilaterally disenrolled R.B. R.B.’s mother eventually requested in an administrative-hearing procedure that R.B. be reinstated at Mastery under the stay-put provision of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The hearing officer refused to reinstate R.B. at Mastery during the appeal process, finding that no placement was actually active when the appeal began. R.B.’s mother appealed that ruling in federal district court, filing a motion for a stay-put injunction.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rufe, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.