R.G. Pope Construction Co. v. Guard Rail of Roanoke, Inc.
Virginia Supreme Court
244 S.E.2d 774 (1978)
- Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Facts
Pope Construction Co. and Pope Paving Co. (Pope) (plaintiffs) entered into a contract with the State of Virginia to build a road. Under that contract, work on the project was to be completed by October 1973, unless the state extended the time for completion because of conditions beyond Pope’s control. Pope contracted with Guard Rail of Roanoke, Inc. (Guard Rail) (defendant) to furnish and install guardrail for the project. The price included in that subcontract was the price being offered by Guard Rail’s supplier, which was locked in until November of 1973. Pope delayed its performance, and the construction site was not ready until July 1974. In April 1974, Guard Rail notified Pope that the earlier quoted price for materials was no longer available and sought to renegotiate the price of material. Pope refused to renegotiate, and Guard Rail refused to perform. Pope hired another subcontractor to furnish and install the guardrail and sued Guard Rail for the additional amount it paid to the new subcontractor. Guard Rail counterclaimed for its lost profits on the project. The lower court entered judgment in favor of Guard Rail. Pope appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Compton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.