Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

Radke v. Brenon

Minnesota Supreme Court
134 N.W.2d 887 (1965)


Facts

Radke (plaintiff) and Brenon (defendant) were neighbors living on separate lots near a lake. Radke, Brenon, and eight of their neighbors each owned property that was separated only by a narrow strip of land from the lake. This narrow strip of property was owned by Dr. Gulden. Brenon purchased the strip of property abutting all ten pieces of property from Dr. Gulden. Radke orally discussed the possibility of purchasing the strip of property bordering his own lot from Brenon. On June 28, 1960, Brenon sent an identical letter to Radke and the eight other neighbors offering to sell the land bordering each person’s property to that person. Brenon offered to sell the property for $212.00 per lot on “any terms agreeable.” This price was based on dividing the total price of the property paid by Brenon ($2,120.00) equally among Brenon, Radke, and the eight other neighbors. Two of the neighbors declined Brenon’s offer, and Brenon divided the price among the remaining eight people. Thus, the price each person was to pay increased to $262.00. Radke was aware of this price increase and orally accepted Brenon’s offer. Over a year passed before the sale was finalized. On August16, 1961, Radke’s attorney informed Brenon in writing that Radke had the check for the purchase price of the property ready for delivery. Sometime after August 16th, Brenon informed Radke that his offer to sell the property was revoked. Radke brought suit in Minnesota state court against Brenon seeking specific performance of the alleged contract for the sale of land. The trial court ordered Brenon to complete specific performance, and Brenon appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Rogosheske, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 119,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.