Raftopol v. Ramey

12 A.3d 783 (2011)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Raftopol v. Ramey

Supreme Court of Connecticut
12 A.3d 783 (2011)

Facts

Domestic partners Anthony Raftopol and Shawn Hargon (plaintiffs) entered into an agreement with Karma Ramey (defendant) in which Ramey agreed to act as a surrogate carrier for the plaintiffs’ child. Raftopol contributed genetic material to eggs provided by a third-party donor, which were subsequently implanted in Ramey. Ramey gave birth to two children. Pursuant to the agreement, Ramey agreed to terminate her parental rights and consent to the adoption of the children by Hargon. Prior to the birth of the children, the plaintiffs filed a petition in trial court seeking a declaratory judgment that that the gestational agreement was valid and that Raftopol and Hargon were the legal parents of the children. Additionally, the plaintiffs requested that the court order the state department of public health (the department) (defendant) to issue a replacement birth certificate reflecting that Raftopol and Hargon were the children’s lawful parents. The department argued that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to terminate the parental rights of Ramey, her husband, the egg donor, and any other necessary party. The trial court disagreed and held that: (1) the gestational agreement was valid, (2) Raftopol was the biological and legal father of the children, (3) Hargon was also the legal father of the children, and (4) Ramey was not the genetic or legal mother of the children. The trial court ordered the department to issue a replacement birth certificate. The department appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McLachlan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 803,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership