Logourl black

Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. New York

United States Supreme Court
336 U.S. 106 (1949)


Facts

A statute promulgated by the State of New York (plaintiff) prohibited vehicles devoted solely to displaying advertisements, but permitted business vehicles to display signs related to their business as long as the business vehicles were not solely used for advertising. Railway Express Agency, Inc. (defendant) was engaged in a nationwide express business and operated about 1,900 trucks in New York City. It sold the space on the exterior sides of its trucks for advertising that was primarily unrelated to its business. Railway was convicted of violating the New York statute in the magistrate’s court and fined. The conviction was sustained by the Court of Special Sessions, and the court of appeals affirmed. Railway Express Agency, Inc. appealed to the United States Supreme Court on the grounds that the regulation did not bear a rational relation to a legitimate state purpose and was thus unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Douglas, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Concurrence (Jackson, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Concurrence (Rutledge, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 77,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 10,692 briefs - keyed to 140 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now